[Chat] moore's 911

[jdy]

i am a big 2nd amendment freak.
judy
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Greg Alexander" <ugagrad93 at yahoo.com>
To: <langwidge at erols.com>; "The Charles Village Chat List"
<Chat at charlesvillage.info>
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 11:16 PM
Subject: RE: [Chat] moore's 911


> He's a big NRA freak.
>
> --- Christine Gray <Langwidge at erols.com> wrote:
> > Dale, I've never heard of Dave Kopel.
> >
> > Is he a crackpot?
> >
> > Christine
> >
> > -- 
> > No trees were harmed in the transmission of this message.
> >
> > However, a significant number of electrons were temporarily
inconvenienced.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dale Ghent [mailto:daleg at elemental.org]
> > Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 9:33 PM
> > To: langwidge at erols.com
> > Cc: The Charles Village Chat List
> > Subject: Re: [Chat] moore's 911
> >
> > On Jul 1, 2004, at 9:06 PM, Christine Gray wrote:
> >
> > > http://www.davekopel.com/Terror/Fiftysix-Deceits-in-Fahrenheit-911.htm
> >
> > Another Dave Kopel pursuit of self-validation.
> >
> > Michael Moore left out a LOT of info, but the content he chose to put
> > into his film cut straight to the point. There are tons of related
> > tangents and sub-plots he could have followed, but in the 122 minutes
> > he limited himself to, he chose wisely.
> >
> > Who cares what the "FLORIDA VICTORY" sign in back of Gore in the
> > opening scene implied. It was there. It was real. It's a sign that any
> > candidate would have up to rally the supporters.
> >
> > Who cares about David Kopel trying to invalidate Moore's critique of
> > Bush's inaction in the minutes after 9am on 9/11 ... by including the
> > opinion of some school teacher? If I were Bush, having already been
> > told one plane had hit the towers, and then another followed, I would
> > have excused myself politely but purposefully from the children and
> > gotten on the matter. This in-the-moment image-making is high
> > school-level stupidity.
> >
> > In David's other rebuttals, he throws them out as-is without any
> > tangible bibliography.
> >
> > "Moore is wrong because so-and-so said this to the contrary." Well,
> > that's great. How are we supposed to know so-and-so actually said that.
> >
> > /dale
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Chat mailing list
> > Chat at charlesvillage.info
> > http://charlesvillage.info/mailman/listinfo/chat_charlesvillage.info
> >
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
> http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chat mailing list
> Chat at charlesvillage.info
> http://charlesvillage.info/mailman/listinfo/chat_charlesvillage.info
>