<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2604" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=role_body style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"
bottomMargin=7 leftMargin=7 topMargin=7 rightMargin=7><FONT id=role_document
face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>
<DIV>Great!</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Thanks, John, that explains the difference all right. In DC, the
norm is that a historic district is first designated local (with review), then
national (mere formality). </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Also, I read with caution the Baltimore change of CHAP into the planning
office. DC did the same a few years ago with their equivalent (Hist Pres
Division and HP Review Board), without first thinking through the enforcement
issue; now that they are part of planning, they have no enforcement of
violations capability like they did when they were formerly with
DCRA. I suspect the same will happen with CHAP. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I was about to write a letter to the Sun concerning the same
thing! </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I'm sure CV has discussed becoming a local district in the past, but would
it be appropriate to discuss the pros and cons again at this time? </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Paul </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT lang=0 face=Arial size=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" PTSIZE="10">Paul K.
Williams<BR>Kelsey & Associates, Inc<BR>2629 Guilford Avenue<BR>Baltimore,
MD 21218 <BR>(410) 366-2629<BR><A
href="http://baltimoremarylandhistory.com/">BaltimoreMarylandHistory.com</A></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT lang=0 face=Arial size=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF"
PTSIZE="10"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT lang=0 face=Arial size=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" PTSIZE="10">1929 13th
Street, NW<BR>Washington, DC 20009<BR>(202) 462-3389<BR><A
href="http://washingtonhistory.com/">WashingtonHistory.com</A><BR> <BR></DIV></FONT></FONT></BODY></HTML>